Agree with the comment below, however, unlike most, the author comes at the topic with reason and historical references, rather than emotion and post modern drivel. In short, she or he is thinking for themselves and not being coached or conditioned into what position to take. Bravo.
A very interesting article, though not very readable. I am very willing to concede that the author is smart and insightful. But a barrage of twisted and tortuous compound sentences is less effective in proving that than is a more liberal use of the period.
Agree with the comment below, however, unlike most, the author comes at the topic with reason and historical references, rather than emotion and post modern drivel. In short, she or he is thinking for themselves and not being coached or conditioned into what position to take. Bravo.
A very interesting article, though not very readable. I am very willing to concede that the author is smart and insightful. But a barrage of twisted and tortuous compound sentences is less effective in proving that than is a more liberal use of the period.